Infrascope 2025/26
Uruguay
Score: 66.8
out of 100
Rank: 5th
out of 26 countries
Following a period of substantial investment in transport and social infrastructure, Uruguay has increasingly focused on managing its existing portfolio of operational public-private partnerships (PPPs), while new education initiatives offer prospects for renewed investment activity. Continued political support and institutional expertise provide a foundation for future projects, although gaps in sustainability and retrospective evaluation remain.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
Population, 20253.4m
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitGDP (US$), 2025$85.3bn
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitSovereign risk rating, Oct 2026BBB+
Source: S&P Global RatingsPPP INVESTMENT
Number, 2016-25*19
Source: IJ Global‡Total (US$), 2016-25$3.5bn
Source: IJ Global‡% of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†17%
Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist EnterprisePPP INVESTMENT BY SECTOR (US$), 2016-25
Transport$2.6bn
Renewables$0.2bn
Energy (non-renewables)$0.4bn
Social infrastructure$0.3bn
Policies and institutions
Recent market developments
Political and public support
Notable strengths
Notable challenges
Recent progress
Top five recommendations for progress
(ordered according to index category)
1
Timeline to achieve
Select
Difficulty to achieve
Select
#N/A
Uruguay: current score
0.0
Score with recommendation applied
0.0
2
Timeline to achieve
Select
Difficulty to achieve
Select
#N/A
Uruguay: current score
0.0
Score with recommendation applied
0.0
3
Timeline to achieve
Select
Difficulty to achieve
Select
#N/A
Uruguay: current score
0.0
Score with recommendation applied
0.0
4
Timeline to achieve
Select
Difficulty to achieve
Select
#N/A
Uruguay: current score
0.0
Score with recommendation applied
0.0
5
Timeline to achieve
Select
Difficulty to achieve
Select
#N/A
Uruguay: current score
0.0
Score with recommendation applied
0.0
Assessment guidance:
Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
1. https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/18786-2011
2. https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/leyes/18786-2011
3. https://www.impo.com.uy/bases/decretos/17-2012
4. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-economia-finanzas/politicas-y-gestion/portafolio-ppp-0
5. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-economia-finanzas/politicas-y-gestion/proyecto-ferrocarril-central-0
6. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-economia-finanzas/politicas-y-gestion/centro-rehabilitacion-tres-unidades-internacion-personas-privadas-libertad
7. https://www.anep.edu.uy/anep-cnd-fortaleceran-desarrollo-proyectos-edilicios-educativos
8. https://presupuestonacional.gub.uy/sites/default/files/2025-09/Tomo%20I%20-%20Res%C3%BAmenes.pdf
9. https://www.anep.edu.uy/anep-cnd-fortaleceran-desarrollo-proyectos-edilicios-educativos
10. https://www.gub.uy/corte-electoral/comunicacion/publicaciones/programas-gobierno-nacional
Infrascope 2025/26
Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries
Nascent
0 to <30
Emerging
30 to <60
Developed
60 to <80
Mature
80 to 100