Infrascope 2025/26
Haiti
Score: 16.5
out of 100
Rank: 25th
out of 26 countries
Haiti’s public-private partnership (PPP) market remains largely inactive, reflecting longstanding institutional weaknesses and severe political and security challenges. Recent government initiatives suggest renewed interest in mobilizing private investment to support infrastructure recovery, including through potential PPPs and concessions. However, these efforts remain at an early stage, with limited progress toward establishing a more comprehensive framework or developing a viable project pipeline.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
Population, 202511.9m
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitGDP (US$), 2025$32.1bn
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitSovereign risk rating, Oct 2026n/a
Source: S&P Global RatingsPPP INVESTMENT
Number, 2016-25*-
Source: IJ Global‡Total (US$), 2016-25-
Source: IJ Global‡% of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†-
Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist EnterprisePolicies and institutions
Haiti's PPP framework remains underdeveloped, with limited institutional capacity to support project development and implementation. The Public Procurement Law of 2009 permits PPPs through build-operate-transfer concessions for public-service infrastructure, but the country lacks dedicated PPP legislation.1 The Central Unit for the Management of Public-Private Partnerships, established within the Ministry of Economy and Finance in 2012, is tasked with promoting and supporting PPPs, although its operational role remains limited. Discussions on a draft PPP decree have continued, but progress has been slow, and no comprehensive framework has been adopted.2
Recent market developments
Haiti's PPP market remains largely inactive, constrained by political instability, insecurity and limited capacity to attract private infrastructure financing. International development partners continue to play a central role in infrastructure investment. Nevertheless, some prospective PPP activity has emerged. In 2025, the International Finance Corporation disclosed an advisory assignment to help structure a competitive tender for private operation of water services in Lascahobas.3 The government also announced plans to manage the newly inaugurated Port of Saint-Louis du Sud through a PPP arrangement.4 Neither initiative has been confirmed as reaching financial close. These developments suggest some potential for private participation, but have yet to translate into meaningful PPP market activity.
Political and public support
Political instability and security challenges have continued to overshadow Haiti's PPP agenda. Since the establishment of the Transitional Presidential Council in 2024, government priorities have centered on restoring security, maintaining essential services and supporting economic recovery. Nevertheless, recent government-led recovery planning has signaled greater interest in mobilizing private infrastructure investment, including through potential PPP concessions for rural electrification.5 In 2025, the government and the Inter-American Development Bank launched work on a 2025-30 recovery and development plan emphasizing private-sector-led growth, infrastructure investment and institutional strengthening.6 While PPPs have attracted little vocal opposition, there is limited evidence of broader political consensus around their development.
Notable strengths
Regulations and institutions is Haiti's highest-scoring category (42.9), although it falls well below the regional average (70.8). The framework establishes competitive bidding requirements and provides for bidder debriefings and independent dispute resolution. Contract management provisions also establish procedures for routine adjustments and formal approval of more substantial changes. Beyond procurement and contract management, Haiti performs comparatively well in specific aspects of risk management, particularly lenders’ step-in rights and disaster-related insurance requirements.
Notable challenges
Haiti ranks last regionally in project preparation and sustainability, financing and ex-post performance evaluation, reflecting weaknesses throughout the PPP project cycle. The absence of systematic prioritization, needs assessments and comprehensive economic appraisal requirements undermines project selection, while limited preparation funding and access to capital constrain development and financing. Downstream, the lack of standardized risk allocation, contract monitoring and ex-post evaluation arrangements further limits the government's ability to manage projects and assess their results.
Recent progress
Recent government efforts to mobilize private infrastructure investment, alongside the absence of identified vocal opposition to PPPs, contribute to Haiti's modestly improved index performance. Recovery planning and prospective infrastructure concessions indicate renewed interest in private participation, although these initiatives remain at an early stage. Discussions on a draft PPP decree have also continued, but progress has been slow. Overall, these developments have yet to produce substantive institutional reforms, sustained PPP investment, or measurable improvements in project preparation and implementation.
Top five recommendations for progress
(ordered according to index category)
1
Establish a comprehensive PPP legal framework
Adopt dedicated PPP legislation and regulations that clarify institutional responsibilities, eligible arrangements, procurement procedures and risk allocation. Establish formal coordination mechanisms between contracting authorities, the national PPP unit and sector regulators to support consistent project development and implementation.
Timeline to achieve
Long term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 1: Regulations and institutions
Haiti: current score
42.9
Score with recommendation applied
56.9
2
Strengthen project selection and appraisal
Establish a national infrastructure plan and standardized procedures for identifying and prioritizing potential PPPs based on infrastructure needs, socioeconomic benefits and fiscal affordability. Require feasibility studies and comparative assessments of procurement options before projects advance toward tendering, helping ensure that limited resources support viable investments.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Haiti: current score
5.6
Score with recommendation applied
19.9
3
Establish dedicated project preparation capacity and funding
Equip the national PPP unit with standardized project preparation procedures, technical expertise, and reliable funding to assist with feasibility studies and transaction structuring. Establish a dedicated preparation facility or equivalent mechanism to coordinate technical support and track projects through development.
Timeline to achieve
Long term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Haiti: current score
5.6
Score with recommendation applied
13.9
4
Strengthen PPP contract monitoring and reporting
Adopt a formal mandate to monitor project progress through standardized reporting procedures, including regular collection of information on contractual milestones, construction delays, changes in project costs and contract variations. Publish periodic updates on awarded PPPs as the project portfolio develops.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
Haiti: current score
22.3
Score with recommendation applied
34.8
5
Develop and publish a credible PPP project pipeline
Identify and screen potential PPP projects in priority infrastructure sectors, then publish a regularly updated pipeline detailing their objectives, development status and anticipated procurement schedules. Coordinate disclosure with project preparation activities to provide investors with credible information about future opportunities.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
Haiti: current score
22.3
Score with recommendation applied
28.6
Assessment guidance:
Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
1. https://mef.gouv.ht/storage/app/uploads/public/622/0ee/0ab/6220ee0ab9202931486005.pdf
2. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/tar/2026/french/tarfa2026044.pdf
3. https://disclosures.ifc.org/project-detail/AS/606070/rural-water-lascahobas-haiti
4. https://mef.gouv.ht/discours-ministre/19
5. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/77f02e9fa5397afdb132e66a4bc06582-0370012025/original/Evaluation-Rapide-Impact-Crise-ERIC-Haiti-2025.pdf
6. https://www.iadb.org/en/news/idb-lead-haitis-medium-term-recovery-and-development-plan-2025-2030
Infrascope 2025/26
Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries
Nascent
0 to <30
Emerging
30 to <60
Developed
60 to <80
Mature
80 to 100