Infrascope 2025/26
Ecuador
Score: 65.6
out of 100
Rank: 6th
out of 26 countries
Ecuador’s public-private partnership (PPP) framework has continued to mature as the government moves from regulatory development toward implementation. New project-selection tools, stronger preparation capacity, standardized contract supervision and an expanding pipeline have supported progress. However, most projects under the newer framework remain in preparation, while a nascent PPP financing ecosystem and broader financial constraints weigh on market development.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
Population, 202518.3m
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitGDP (US$), 2025$130.3bn
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitSovereign risk rating, Oct 2026B
Source: S&P Global RatingsPPP INVESTMENT
Number, 2016-25*11
Source: IJ Global‡Total (US$), 2016-25$3.4bn
Source: IJ Global‡% of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†23%
Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist EnterprisePPP INVESTMENT BY SECTOR (US$), 2016-25
Transport$3.3bn
Energy (non-renewables)$0.1bn
Policies and institutions
Ecuador’s PPP framework has developed rapidly in recent years, with reforms increasingly focused on translating its regulatory architecture into project preparation. The Organic Law for Economic Efficiency and Job Generation (2023) and its 2024 implementing regulation strengthened the framework, followed by detailed guidance on project eligibility, prioritization and approval.1,2,3 In late 2025, the dedicated PPP secretariat was incorporated into the newly formed Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, which became the Ministry of Infrastructure and Technology in 2026. The PPP functions continue through a dedicated vice ministry.4,5 The framework also provides for centralized interinstitutional approval of PPP projects and specialized oversight of their fiscal implications.6,7
Recent market developments
Ecuador is gradually building a pipeline under its newer PPP framework, although most projects remain in preparation. Seven central-government projects were prioritized and entered into the National PPP Registry in 2024, comprising six road corridors and the Esmeraldas port terminal. The pipeline has subsequently expanded, with additional projects in locations including Guayaquil, Quito and the Galápagos.8,9,10 Existing concessions have also continued to attract investment, including expansion of the Puerto Bolívar terminal.11 The growing pipeline signals increasing use of the new framework, but recent market activity still largely consists of projects in preparation or further investment in concessions awarded before the current regime became operational.
Political and public support
The government has maintained explicit support for PPPs, incorporating them into its 2025-29 National Development Plan as a means of improving transport connectivity, expanding telecommunications networks and supporting cleaner electricity supply.12 Since taking office in 2023, the current administration has implemented PPP reforms, introduced guidance for project preparation and selection, and advanced projects through the national registry. Political and institutional disagreements have complicated investment reforms in the past, including the rejection of a proposed investment law under the previous administration.13 Nevertheless, the current framework retains executive backing, with published sectoral commitments and regulatory measures increasingly focused on translating PPP policy into viable projects.
Notable strengths
Ecuador performs particularly well in project preparation and sustainability, ranking 3rd regionally, with its environmental and social sustainability framework ranking 1st. Its framework embeds environmental assessment, climate resilience and social considerations across project preparation rather than treating them primarily as downstream safeguards. Risk management and contract monitoring also ranks 3rd, supported by standardized contract supervision and disaster-risk management, where Ecuador is joint 1st. These capabilities build on a comprehensive regulatory and institutional framework, including clear project-approval processes and dedicated capacity for managing the PPP program.
Notable challenges
Financing remains Ecuador’s principal challenge, ranking 16th overall and 23rd for access to capital. This reflects both broader financial constraints and a relatively young PPP market with a limited transaction record under the newer framework, giving financing channels less opportunity to develop. As the pipeline advances, further priorities include strengthening bidder feedback, developing regular public reporting on project implementation and establishing a comprehensive methodology for ex-post evaluations.
Recent progress
Ecuador has made substantial progress in translating its PPP framework into operational tools. Project preparation and sustainability rose from 55.9 to 75.4, driven by a standardized qualitative tool for value-for-money pre-feasibility assessment, stronger preparation capacity, a formal process for addressing project viability gaps, and greater integration of climate and employment considerations. Risk management and contract monitoring rose from 69.8 to 77.2, supported by stronger disaster-risk provisions and standardized contract supervision. The national PPP registry and new ex-post evaluation requirements provide further evidence of institutional development, although implementation remains at an early stage.
Top five recommendations for progress
(ordered according to index category)
1
Introduce post-award bidder debriefs
Require procuring entities to provide unsuccessful bidders with a concise post-award debrief on request, explaining the main strengths and weaknesses of their bids. This would improve transparency and help strengthen bidder participation as Ecuador looks to bring its pipeline to market.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 1: Regulations and institutions
Ecuador: current score
92.7
Score with recommendation applied
94.8
2
Complete a cost-benefit analysis methodology and toolkit
Build on the 2024 project appraisal framework by publishing a practical socioeconomic cost-benefit methodology and standardized evaluation tool for PPP preparation. Clear valuation methods, assumptions and templates would improve consistency across projects while preserving Ecuador’s existing eligibility and value-for-money processes.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Ecuador: current score
75.4
Score with recommendation applied
77.4
3
Develop targeted financial support for PPPs
As priority projects move toward tender, establish transparent criteria and instruments for post-preparation financial support where market testing identifies financing constraints. Credit enhancement, concessional finance or targeted guarantees should be used selectively and remain subject to existing fiscal-risk controls.
Timeline to achieve
Long term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 3: Financing
Ecuador: current score
42.1
Score with recommendation applied
50.4
4
Publish consolidated post-award progress reports
Use the national PPP registry as the backbone for regular public updates on awarded PPPs and legacy concessions. Standardized reporting should cover construction progress, implementation milestones, material contract changes and operational status, drawing on information already collected by contracting authorities.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
Ecuador: current score
77.2
Score with recommendation applied
83.5
5
Establish a robust ex-post PPP evaluation methodology
Develop a standardized ex-post evaluation methodology before the new pipeline reaches maturity, covering risk performance, lessons from risk allocation, realized costs and benefits, and value for money. Use qualified, independent evaluators so findings can credibly inform future project design.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 5: Performance evaluation and impact (ex-post)
Ecuador: current score
40.6
Score with recommendation applied
55.6
Assessment guidance:
Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
1. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-461/
2. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/tercer-suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-496/
3. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/cuarto-suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-586/
4. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/tercer-suplemento-no-195/
5. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/cuarto-suplemento-no-312/
6. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-461/
7. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/tercer-suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-496/
8. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/registro-oficial-no-588/
9. https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/quinto-suplemento-no-103/
10. https://www.appecuador.gob.ec/portafolio-de-proyectos-publicos-con-participacion-privada/
11. https://www.puertobolivar.gob.ec/noticias/appb-reporta-inversiones-a-cargo-de-yilportecu-s-a-durante-el-2025-y-2026/
12. https://planificacion.presidencia.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/PlanNacionalDeDesarrollo25-29_EcuadorNoSeDetiene.pdf
13. https://www.asambleanacional.gob.ec/es/noticia/78535-asamblea-nacional-nego-y-archivo-el-proyecto-economico
Infrascope 2025/26
Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries
Nascent
0 to <30
Emerging
30 to <60
Developed
60 to <80
Mature
80 to 100
Case study
Building a pipeline of bankable PPPs in Ecuador
Ecuador is reforming its PPP framework to turn infrastructure ambitions into viable investments. With stronger project preparation, clearer approval processes and greater fiscal oversight, its emerging pipeline will test whether institutional reforms can translate into successful transactions.