Infrascope 2025/26
Costa Rica
Score: 53.0
out of 100
Rank: 11th
out of 26 countries
Costa Rica has a longstanding public-private partnership (PPP) framework and has continued to strengthen its technical processes for project development. However, these foundations have yet to translate into renewed transaction activity: no PPP reached financial close during 2016-25. A small number of concessions are progressing through preparation. Recent efforts to establish a more unified PPP framework demonstrate continued interest in expanding private participation in infrastructure.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
Population, 20255.2m
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitGDP (US$), 2025$102.9bn
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitSovereign risk rating, Oct 2026BB
Source: S&P Global RatingsPPP INVESTMENT
Number, 2016-25*-
Source: IJ Global‡Total (US$), 2016-25-
Source: IJ Global‡% of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†-
Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist EnterprisePolicies and institutions
Costa Rica's PPP framework is based around the 1998 concessions law, with separate rules introduced in 2016 for public-private collaboration contracts.1,2 The National Concessions Council (CNC) provides specialized technical support for public-works concessions, including PPP-type projects, but its mandate does not automatically extend to other PPP contractual arrangements under the 2016 PPP regulations. The Ministry of Finance provides complementary fiscal assessment and methodological guidance through its broader public-debt management structure, following reorganization in 2026.3 A proposed Framework Law on Public-Private Partnerships has sought to unify institutional oversight, but after advancing through the legislature, the Constitutional Chamber identified constitutional issues with several provisions in September 2026, leaving the reform unresolved.4
Recent market developments
Costa Rica has not recorded a PPP financial close since 2015, but several potential concessions are under development. In 2026 the CNC sought expressions of interest for the proposed San José-Cartago road concession,5 which remains in the preparatory stage, while a new concession to modernize and operate Puerto Caldera was awarded in 2026, although the contract has yet to be finalized.6 Other initiatives have fallen away, including the Tren Huetar proposal, which the CNC archived in 2026.7 This project-development activity therefore signals renewed momentum, but has yet to demonstrate Costa Rica's ability to bring a new generation of PPPs to financial close.
Political and public support
Political support for private participation in infrastructure has remained relatively consistent despite limited recent PPP activity. The Rodrigo Chaves administration (2022-26) continued to promote private investment in infrastructure, while PPPs and concessions featured in national development planning. Legislative consideration of the proposed Framework Law on Public-Private Partnerships provided further evidence of this support, receiving broad backing in its first legislative debate in May 2026.8 However, the subsequent constitutional objections mean that this political support has yet to produce a consolidated new framework.
Notable strengths
Costa Rica has comprehensive project-selection processes, ranking third regionally, with established methodologies for identifying, prioritizing and economically assessing potential projects. Its institutional framework benefits from specialized concessions expertise and complementary fiscal and technical capacity, although dedicated PPP support does not extend consistently across contractual arrangements. Other notable strengths include protections against government-related risks and favorable access to capital, both ranking third in the region. These upstream capabilities provide a foundation for developing projects, even though PPP activity remains limited.
Notable challenges
A decade without PPPs reaching financial close weighs heavily on Costa Rica’s index performance, with PPP-specific financing remaining limited despite favorable broader access to capital. Performance evaluation and impact is the country's weakest category, scoring 17.9, reflecting limited market maturity alongside gaps in ex-post evaluation and systematic infrastructure monitoring. Transparency is also uneven, with no consolidated PPP registry or regularly updated pipeline and gaps in contract disclosure and ongoing project reporting.
Recent progress
Costa Rica has continued to strengthen the technical foundations for PPP development. Joint guidance issued by the Ministry of National Planning and Economic Policy and the Ministry of Finance in 2024 further formalized project-selection processes, alongside more detailed methodologies for assessing fiscal commitments and risks. A 2024-25 capacity-building program also provided PPP-specific training to more than 50 officials, including training toward professional certification. Climate considerations are now better integrated into project selection, although gaps remain in resilience and social criteria.
Top five recommendations for progress
(ordered according to index category)
1
Unify the PPP regulatory and institutional framework
Advance reforms to harmonize Costa Rica's overlapping PPP and concessions frameworks, establishing consistent requirements and clearly designated PPP institutions, technical support, coordination and oversight across contractual arrangements, while building on the CNC's existing institutional capabilities.
Timeline to achieve
Long term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 1: Regulations and institutions
Costa Rica: current score
80.2
Score with recommendation applied
87.5
2
Standardize PPP assessment and preparation processes
Build on existing methodologies by introducing standardized tools for value-for-money<sup>9</sup> and fiscal-affordability assessments, aligning fiscal assessment with conventional public procurement and using a common platform to track project preparation across Costa Rica’s fragmented PPP regime.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Costa Rica: current score
52.5
Score with recommendation applied
59.4
3
Strengthen resilience and social criteria in project selection
Expand existing sustainability requirements by incorporating explicit criteria for climate resilience and future-proofing, social inclusion, gender, and job creation into PPP selection and preparation, building on progress already made on incorporating climate considerations.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Costa Rica: current score
52.5
Score with recommendation applied
65.0
4
Publish a consolidated and regularly updated PPP pipeline
Consolidate prospective PPPs and concessions into a publicly accessible pipeline, with regular updates on their preparation and procurement status, giving investors greater visibility as Costa Rica seeks to revive transaction activity.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
Costa Rica: current score
59.9
Score with recommendation applied
66.1
5
Formalize PPP ex-post evaluation and quality monitoring
Require PPP projects to undergo ex-post evaluation at appropriate stages, with standardized criteria for assessing project outcomes, and strengthen service-quality monitoring and reporting requirements for operational infrastructure.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 5: Performance evaluation and impact (ex-post)
Costa Rica: current score
17.9
Score with recommendation applied
41.5
Assessment guidance:
Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
1. https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?nValor1=1&nValor2=30464
2. https://www.hacienda.go.cr/docs/DecretoN39965-H-MPReglamentoparalosContratosdeColaboracionPublicoPrivada.pdf
3. https://sinalevi.go.cr/ResultadosNormativa/Informacion?param1=106320¶m2=149707¶m3=3¶m4=3
4. https://vlex.co.cr/vid/sentencia-n-2026036043-sala-1135443474
5. https://repositorio.mopt.go.cr/handle/123456789/5915
6. https://www.incop.go.cr/wp-content/uploads/general/ModPtoCaldera/Boletines/INCOP-Bolet%C3%ADn%20004-Marzo%202026.pdf
7. https://repositorio.mopt.go.cr/handle/123456789/5771
8. https://delfino.cr/asamblea/votaciones/proyecto/20260518001
9. Costa Rica has published a detailed VfM methodology with a worked numerical example. However, neither the accompanying Excel workbook nor a standardized, reusable evaluation tool are readily available.
Infrascope 2025/26
Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries
Nascent
0 to <30
Emerging
30 to <60
Developed
60 to <80
Mature
80 to 100