Logo for Economist Enterprise featuring white uppercase text centered on a solid red rectangular background
  • Search Economist Enterprise

  • Infrascope 2025/26
    Infrascope 2025/26

    Costa Rica

    Score: 53.0
    out of 100
    Rank: 11th
    out of 26 countries

    Costa Rica has a longstanding public-private partnership (PPP) framework and has continued to strengthen its technical processes for project development. However, these foundations have yet to translate into renewed transaction activity: no PPP reached financial close during 2016-25. A small number of concessions are progressing through preparation. Recent efforts to establish a more unified PPP framework demonstrate continued interest in expanding private participation in infrastructure.

    CRI_name
    MACRO ENVIRONMENT
    Population, 20255.2m
    Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit
    GDP (US$), 2025$102.9bn
    Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit
    Sovereign risk rating, Oct 2026BB
    Source: S&P Global Ratings
    PPP INVESTMENT
    Number, 2016-25*-
    Source: IJ Global‡
    Total (US$), 2016-25-
    Source: IJ Global‡
    % of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†-
    Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist Enterprise
    * Number of projects that reached financial close, including subnational projects. † Value of infrastructure PPPs (see definition in IJ Global footnote) divided by total infrastructure spending (estimated using Infralatam’s public sector estimates and Economist Impact calculations), averaged over the past ten years. ‡ Source: IJ Global, cross-checked with the World Bank PPI database. Data may include projects that are developed under PPP, sectoral or concession laws, with differences among countries. Focuses on greenfield and brownfield projects; excludes asset acquisition, company acquisition, securitization and refinancing transactions.
    Policies and institutions
    Costa Rica's PPP framework is based around the 1998 concessions law, with separate rules introduced in 2016 for public-private collaboration contracts.1,2 The National Concessions Council (CNC) provides specialized technical support for public-works concessions, including PPP-type projects, but its mandate does not automatically extend to other PPP contractual arrangements under the 2016 PPP regulations. The Ministry of Finance provides complementary fiscal assessment and methodological guidance through its broader public-debt management structure, following reorganization in 2026.3 A proposed Framework Law on Public-Private Partnerships has sought to unify institutional oversight, but after advancing through the legislature, the Constitutional Chamber identified constitutional issues with several provisions in September 2026, leaving the reform unresolved.4
    Recent market developments
    Costa Rica has not recorded a PPP financial close since 2015, but several potential concessions are under development. In 2026 the CNC sought expressions of interest for the proposed San José-Cartago road concession,5 which remains in the preparatory stage, while a new concession to modernize and operate Puerto Caldera was awarded in 2026, although the contract has yet to be finalized.6 Other initiatives have fallen away, including the Tren Huetar proposal, which the CNC archived in 2026.7 This project-development activity therefore signals renewed momentum, but has yet to demonstrate Costa Rica's ability to bring a new generation of PPPs to financial close.
    Political and public support
    Political support for private participation in infrastructure has remained relatively consistent despite limited recent PPP activity. The Rodrigo Chaves administration (2022-26) continued to promote private investment in infrastructure, while PPPs and concessions featured in national development planning. Legislative consideration of the proposed Framework Law on Public-Private Partnerships provided further evidence of this support, receiving broad backing in its first legislative debate in May 2026.8 However, the subsequent constitutional objections mean that this political support has yet to produce a consolidated new framework.
    Notable strengths
    Costa Rica has comprehensive project-selection processes, ranking third regionally, with established methodologies for identifying, prioritizing and economically assessing potential projects. Its institutional framework benefits from specialized concessions expertise and complementary fiscal and technical capacity, although dedicated PPP support does not extend consistently across contractual arrangements. Other notable strengths include protections against government-related risks and favorable access to capital, both ranking third in the region. These upstream capabilities provide a foundation for developing projects, even though PPP activity remains limited.
    Notable challenges
    A decade without PPPs reaching financial close weighs heavily on Costa Rica’s index performance, with PPP-specific financing remaining limited despite favorable broader access to capital. Performance evaluation and impact is the country's weakest category, scoring 17.9, reflecting limited market maturity alongside gaps in ex-post evaluation and systematic infrastructure monitoring. Transparency is also uneven, with no consolidated PPP registry or regularly updated pipeline and gaps in contract disclosure and ongoing project reporting.
    Recent progress
    Costa Rica has continued to strengthen the technical foundations for PPP development. Joint guidance issued by the Ministry of National Planning and Economic Policy and the Ministry of Finance in 2024 further formalized project-selection processes, alongside more detailed methodologies for assessing fiscal commitments and risks. A 2024-25 capacity-building program also provided PPP-specific training to more than 50 officials, including training toward professional certification. Climate considerations are now better integrated into project selection, although gaps remain in resilience and social criteria.

    Top five recommendations for progress

    (ordered according to index category)

    1
    Unify the PPP regulatory and institutional framework
    Advance reforms to harmonize Costa Rica's overlapping PPP and concessions frameworks, establishing consistent requirements and clearly designated PPP institutions, technical support, coordination and oversight across contractual arrangements, while building on the CNC's existing institutional capabilities.
    Timeline to achieve
    Long term
    Difficulty to achieve
    High
    Impact on category 1: Regulations and institutions
    Costa Rica: current score
    80.2
    Score with recommendation applied
    87.5
    020406080100
    2
    Standardize PPP assessment and preparation processes
    Build on existing methodologies by introducing standardized tools for value-for-money<sup>9</sup> and fiscal-affordability assessments, aligning fiscal assessment with conventional public procurement and using a common platform to track project preparation across Costa Rica’s fragmented PPP regime.
    Timeline to achieve
    Medium term
    Difficulty to achieve
    High
    Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
    Costa Rica: current score
    52.5
    Score with recommendation applied
    59.4
    020406080100
    3
    Strengthen resilience and social criteria in project selection
    Expand existing sustainability requirements by incorporating explicit criteria for climate resilience and future-proofing, social inclusion, gender, and job creation into PPP selection and preparation, building on progress already made on incorporating climate considerations.
    Timeline to achieve
    Short term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Low
    Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
    Costa Rica: current score
    52.5
    Score with recommendation applied
    65.0
    020406080100
    4
    Publish a consolidated and regularly updated PPP pipeline
    Consolidate prospective PPPs and concessions into a publicly accessible pipeline, with regular updates on their preparation and procurement status, giving investors greater visibility as Costa Rica seeks to revive transaction activity.
    Timeline to achieve
    Short term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Low
    Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
    Costa Rica: current score
    59.9
    Score with recommendation applied
    66.1
    020406080100
    5
    Formalize PPP ex-post evaluation and quality monitoring
    Require PPP projects to undergo ex-post evaluation at appropriate stages, with standardized criteria for assessing project outcomes, and strengthen service-quality monitoring and reporting requirements for operational infrastructure.
    Timeline to achieve
    Medium term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Medium
    Impact on category 5: Performance evaluation and impact (ex-post)
    Costa Rica: current score
    17.9
    Score with recommendation applied
    41.5
    020406080100
    Assessment guidance:
    Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
    Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
    Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
    Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
    1. https://pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?nValor1=1&nValor2=30464
    2. https://www.hacienda.go.cr/docs/DecretoN39965-H-MPReglamentoparalosContratosdeColaboracionPublicoPrivada.pdf
    3. https://sinalevi.go.cr/ResultadosNormativa/Informacion?param1=106320&param2=149707&param3=3&param4=3
    4. https://vlex.co.cr/vid/sentencia-n-2026036043-sala-1135443474
    5. https://repositorio.mopt.go.cr/handle/123456789/5915
    6. https://www.incop.go.cr/wp-content/uploads/general/ModPtoCaldera/Boletines/INCOP-Bolet%C3%ADn%20004-Marzo%202026.pdf
    7. https://repositorio.mopt.go.cr/handle/123456789/5771
    8. https://delfino.cr/asamblea/votaciones/proyecto/20260518001
    9. Costa Rica has published a detailed VfM methodology with a worked numerical example. However, neither the accompanying Excel workbook nor a standardized, reusable evaluation tool are readily available.

    Infrascope 2025/26

    Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries

    Nascent

    0 to <30

    Emerging

    30 to <60

    Developed

    60 to <80

    Mature

    80 to 100
    0102030405060708090100
    Infrascope 2025/26
    See the resource library for more downloads