Infrascope 2025/26
Colombia
Score: 73.0
out of 100
Rank: 3rd
out of 26 countries
Colombia remains one of the region’s most mature and active public-private partnership (PPP) markets, supported by a strong regulatory framework, capable institutions and diverse sources of project financing. Its overall performance has remained broadly stable since 2023/24, while recent developments point to continued evolution, including greater diversification beyond highways and expansion into new infrastructure sectors.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
Population, 202553.4m
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitGDP (US$), 2025$457.1bn
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitSovereign risk rating, Oct 2026BB-
Source: S&P Global RatingsPPP INVESTMENT
Number, 2016-25*79
Source: IJ Global‡Total (US$), 2016-25$25.3bn
Source: IJ Global‡% of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†29%
Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist EnterprisePPP INVESTMENT BY SECTOR (US$), 2016-25
Transport$23.8bn
Renewables$0.6bn
Energy (non-renewables)$0.6bn
Water and waste$0.02bn
Social infrastructure$0.3bn
Policies and institutions
Colombia’s PPP framework remains anchored in the 2012 PPP Law, with the National Planning Department (DNP) providing policy leadership and technical support. The National Infrastructure Agency (ANI) plans, coordinates, structures, procures, manages and evaluates national infrastructure concessions, while Financiera de Desarrollo Nacional supports project development and financing. Article 105 of Law 2294 (2023) expanded ANI’s mandate beyond transport, allowing it to develop social and productive infrastructure projects through PPPs and concessions, based on priorities set by relevant sector ministries and in coordination with territorial governments.1 Colombia has also expanded practical guidance on areas including climate resilience and PPP contract management, although some of this guidance remains non-binding.
Recent market developments
Colombia continues to sustain one of the region’s largest PPP markets. Major road concessions remain important, including the Buga-Buenaventura 5G project, which secured COP3.66trn in sustainable financing in 2025 from domestic and international lenders.2 Recent activity also illustrates diversification beyond highways, spanning urban transit, social infrastructure and rail. Most notably, the government signed the COP3.39trn La Dorada-Chiriguaná concession in 2025, the first railway PPP awarded under Colombia’s 2012 PPP framework. The 526-km freight corridor marks an important extension of the country’s established PPP model into rail infrastructure.3,4
Political and public support
Colombia has maintained political support for PPPs across successive administrations, although infrastructure priorities have varied. Under the previous administration (2022-26), the National Development Plan 2022-26 explicitly supported PPPs,5 while the government advanced existing 5G road concessions and awarded the country’s first railway PPP under the 2012 framework. Following the June 2026 election, the new administration has announced changes to port-concession rules aimed at attracting private capital, outlined plans to reform PPP legislation and prioritized resolving bottlenecks affecting ongoing projects.6,7 These initiatives signal continued support for private infrastructure participation, although the scope and implementation of the new government's broader PPP agenda remain to be seen.
Notable strengths
Colombia’s regulatory and institutional framework is among the region’s most developed, scoring 97.4 and ranking 3rd in the region. This foundation extends into project preparation, where Colombia ranks 2nd for project selection and has well-established preparation processes, methodological tools and project-development support. Financing is another comparative strength, with Colombia ranking 2nd for the structure and diversity of PPP financing. Its mature PPP track record and broader infrastructure-monitoring and evaluation mechanisms also support a 3rd-place ranking in performance evaluation and impact, although project-level ex-post evaluation requirements remain less developed.
Notable challenges
Colombia’s clearest relative weakness is environmental and social sustainability, where it scores 28.8 and ranks 12th regionally. Although environmental assessment and community consultation processes are established, climate resilience and socioeconomic inclusion objectives are not systematically embedded in PPP preparation and contracting. Contract management presents another, narrower gap: national requirements do not comprehensively address areas such as stakeholder and information management, claims and changes in project ownership or financing.
Recent progress
Colombia’s overall performance has remained broadly stable, reflecting continuity in its regulatory and institutional framework. However, PPP investment has gained ground: averaged across sectors, PPPs accounted for 20.9% of infrastructure spending over the past decade, up from 15.0% in the previous Infrascope assessment—the largest percentage-point increase in the region. Recent projects also signal the beginnings of diversification beyond highway concessions, particularly into rail infrastructure. Alongside these market developments, Colombia initiated an ex-post evaluation of its road-concession program through SINERGIA in 2025.
Top five recommendations for progress
(ordered according to index category)
1
Strengthen PPP prioritization, including through climate and social sustainability criteria
Systematically incorporate climate resilience and socioeconomic objectives, including gender, employment, and small-business considerations, into PPP selection and development. Introduce comparative project-ranking criteria to help prioritize potential PPPs as Colombia expands into social infrastructure.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Colombia: current score
68.1
Score with recommendation applied
85.8
2
Improve transparency of environmental assessments and community consultations
Require publication of environmental impact assessments and the findings of community consultations for PPP projects. Colombia already conducts these processes, but greater disclosure would strengthen accountability, particularly as Colombia expands PPPs into social infrastructure.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Colombia: current score
68.1
Score with recommendation applied
70.3
3
Standardize key PPP contract-management requirements and monitoring
Build on existing regulations, guidance and project-level practices by establishing a common contractual baseline for key management processes and standardized templates for monitoring PPP performance. This would improve consistency while clarifying project-specific responsibilities between contracting parties.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
Colombia: current score
70.7
Score with recommendation applied
80.1
4
Strengthen project-level ex-post evaluation and apply lessons to new PPP sectors
Require systematic ex-post evaluation and published results for individual PPP projects, supported by standardized methodologies and independent assessment arrangements. Build on existing institutional expertise to apply lessons from Colombia’s mature road-concession program to emerging sectors, particularly social infrastructure.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 5: Performance evaluation and impact (ex-post)
Colombia: current score
54.5
Score with recommendation applied
63.4
5
Assess PPP contributions to climate and sustainable-development outcomes
Expand ex-post evaluation to assess whether PPPs contribute to national climate commitments and broader sustainable-development objectives. This would provide evidence on whether projects deliver environmental and social benefits beyond their immediate infrastructure outcomes.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 5: Performance evaluation and impact (ex-post)
Colombia: current score
54.5
Score with recommendation applied
79.5
Assessment guidance:
Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
1. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=209510
2. https://www.ani.gov.co/nl/w/proyecto-5g-buga-buenaventura-cierra-la-financiaci%C3%B3n-sostenible-por-3-66-billones-de-pesos
3. https://wwwold.ani.gov.co/gobierno-nacional-firma-contrato-de-concesion-de-la-primera-app-ferrea-de-colombia-en-el-corredor-la
4. https://www.ani.gov.co/documents/20117/390564/presentacion_rdc_2025_evento.pdf
5. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=209510
6. https://www.presidencia.gov.co/prensa/Paginas/Presidente-De-La-Espriella-presento-decreto-para-impulsar-la-modernizacion-261009.aspx
7. https://www.valoraanalitik.com/gobierno-de-la-espriella-prepara-reforma-a-la-ley-app-para-ajustar-plazos-de-concesiones/
Infrascope 2025/26
Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries
Nascent
0 to <30
Emerging
30 to <60
Developed
60 to <80
Mature
80 to 100