Infrascope 2025/26
Barbados
Score: 25.0
out of 100
Rank: 21st
out of 26 countries
Barbados has taken steps toward a more structured approach to public-private partnerships (PPPs), with the Cabinet endorsing a draft PPP framework in 2025 and new institutional arrangements emerging for PPP oversight.1 A long-term national investment plan has also strengthened infrastructure planning. However, no PPPs reached financial close in 2016-25, and significant gaps remain in project preparation, dedicated institutional capacity, contract monitoring and ex-post evaluation.
MACRO ENVIRONMENT
Population, 2025283,000
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitGDP (US$), 2025$8.1bn
Source: The Economist Intelligence UnitSovereign risk rating, Oct 2026B+
Source: S&P Global RatingsPPP INVESTMENT
Number, 2016-25*-
Source: IJ Global‡Total (US$), 2016-25-
Source: IJ Global‡% of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†-
Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist EnterprisePolicies and institutions
Barbados has begun moving away from a largely case-by-case approach to PPPs. The Public Procurement Act of 2021 provides a legal basis for PPP procurement, but detailed implementation guidance has been lacking.2 In May 2025, the Cabinet endorsed a draft PPP framework prepared by the Ministry of Finance to guide government decision-making while formal regulations and guidelines are developed.3 The framework sets out principles and institutional arrangements for PPPs under consideration, but is not yet a publicly codified regulatory framework. Barbados lacks a dedicated PPP unit, although government bodies within the Ministry of Finance have assumed PPP oversight roles.
Recent market developments
Barbados’s PPP market remains nascent, with no projects reaching financial close in 2016-25, although several initiatives have advanced. Most notably, the government launched a competitive tender in November 2025 for the 30-50 MW Lamberts and Castle Wind Project, with three bidders prequalified in April 2026 to develop, finance, construct, operate and maintain the project.4,5 Meanwhile, negotiations over a concession for Grantley Adams International Airport remained ongoing, with the draft concession agreement still under review as of its latest published financial statements.6
Political and public support
Political support has provided a favorable backdrop for PPP development in Barbados. The current administration has continued to promote private participation in infrastructure, including through efforts to develop a more structured PPP framework and advance projects in transport and renewable energy. The government has also worked with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other development partners to strengthen public investment management, with the 2025 draft PPP framework a part of its IMF-supported reform program.7 PPP support has extended across the two major parties: both the governing Barbados Labour Party and opposition Democratic Labour Party supported forms of public-private collaboration in their 2022 election platforms.8,9
Notable strengths
Barbados’s relative strengths lie mainly in the broader enabling environment rather than demonstrated PPP capabilities. Financing is its highest-ranked category, at 18th, supported by relatively strong capital portability, financial-market maturity and use of sustainable-finance instruments. Barbados also performs well on financial auditing and reporting standards and benefits from comparatively favorable broader institutional and country-risk conditions. These conditions could support future private infrastructure investment, but they contrast with limited evidence of PPP-specific institutional capacity or experience financing completed projects.
Notable challenges
Barbados still lacks a fully formalized PPP regulatory and institutional framework, including publicly codified guidance and a dedicated PPP unit. Significant gaps also persist across the project lifecycle. Project preparation and sustainability scores just 18.5 out of 100, reflecting limited socioeconomic assessment, PPP prioritization, and environmental and social requirements. Contract-management provisions and national PPP monitoring and reporting guidelines are weak, while formal ex-post evaluation remains largely absent. Together, these gaps constrain Barbados’s ability to translate political support and an improving enabling environment into a functioning PPP program.
Recent progress
Barbados has taken several steps toward a more structured approach to PPP development. The 2024 publication of Barbados 2035 established long-term infrastructure priorities and investment needs, addressing a previous gap in strategic planning. Institutional arrangements are also evolving: the Cabinet-endorsed draft PPP framework provides greater structure for decision-making, while a PPP Committee within the Ministry of Finance now reviews project concepts and feasibility studies. Together, these measures provide a clearer foundation for identifying and developing potential PPPs.
Top five recommendations for progress
(ordered according to index category)
1
Formalize and publish the PPP regulatory framework
Build on the Cabinet-endorsed draft framework by adopting and publishing detailed PPP regulations and guidance. These should clarify institutional responsibilities, PPP modalities and procedures across the project lifecycle, providing agencies and investors with a consistent framework.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 1: Regulations and institutions
Barbados: current score
37.7
Score with recommendation applied
47.6
2
Establish a dedicated PPP unit with technical capacity
Build dedicated PPP capacity within the Ministry of Finance, with permanent staff covering financial, legal and technical expertise. This function should support contracting authorities in project development and provide PPP-specific guidance and training across government.
Timeline to achieve
Long term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 1: Regulations and institutions
Barbados: current score
37.7
Score with recommendation applied
62.7
3
Strengthen needs assessment and PPP prioritization
Establish systematic needs assessments and transparent prioritization criteria to identify the infrastructure projects most suitable for PPP delivery. The process should help translate priorities identified in Barbados 2035 into a sequenced pipeline of viable potential projects.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
Medium
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Barbados: current score
18.5
Score with recommendation applied
26.8
4
Require comprehensive economic and fiscal project appraisal
Require proposed PPPs to undergo socioeconomic cost-benefit and fiscal-affordability assessments before approval, consistent with other types of procurement. Standard methodologies and tools for these, and for existing value-for-money assessments, would strengthen the consistency, transparency and rigor of project appraisal, supporting more informed investment decisions.
Timeline to achieve
Medium term
Difficulty to achieve
High
Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
Barbados: current score
18.5
Score with recommendation applied
28.9
5
Publish PPP pipeline and project-status information
Develop a publicly accessible PPP database covering projects under consideration and regularly publish updates on projects after they are awarded. Consistent reporting would improve transparency while allowing government, investors and other stakeholders to track PPP development and implementation.
Timeline to achieve
Short term
Difficulty to achieve
Low
Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
Barbados: current score
24.0
Score with recommendation applied
36.5
Assessment guidance:
Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
1. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2025/english/1brbea2025001-print-pdf.pdf
2. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/bar221061.pdf
3. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2025/english/1brbea2025001-print-pdf.pdf
4. https://energy.gov.bb/pre-qualified-bidders-for-landmark-wind-project
5. https://energy.gov.bb/job/request-for-prequalification-for-the-lamberts-and-castle-wind-project/
6. https://www.barbadosparliament.com/uploads/sittings/attachments/0d78b49f0f65546ce81f2eda983c70dd.pdf
7. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2025/english/1brbea2025001-print-pdf.pdf
8. https://www.blp.org.bb/manifestos/
9. https://dlpbds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/DLP-Manifesto2022Online.pdf
Infrascope 2025/26
Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries
Nascent
0 to <30
Emerging
30 to <60
Developed
60 to <80
Mature
80 to 100