Logo for Economist Enterprise featuring white uppercase text centered on a solid red rectangular background
  • Search Economist Enterprise

  • Infrascope 2025/26
    Infrascope 2025/26

    Brazil

    Score: 79.9
    out of 100
    Rank: 1st
    out of 26 countries

    Brazil’s comprehensive public-private partnership (PPP) framework, extensive project experience and diverse financing market underpin its consistently strong performance. PPP activity is growing in social infrastructure alongside traditional sectors. Recent initiatives to standardize project preparation and strengthen infrastructure resilience reflect a focus on refining an already mature PPP system. Remaining challenges center on translating this maturity into more consistent sustainability and risk-management practices. Note: Brazil is a large and complex market with many different subnational PPP contexts. Future research will look to understand these realities at a state level.

    BRA_name
    MACRO ENVIRONMENT
    Population, 2025212.8m
    Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit
    GDP (US$), 2025$2.3trn
    Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit
    Sovereign risk rating, Oct 2026BB
    Source: S&P Global Ratings
    PPP INVESTMENT
    Number, 2016-25*404
    Source: IJ Global‡
    Total (US$), 2016-25$98.5bn
    Source: IJ Global‡
    % of all infrastructure investment, 2016-25†32%
    Source: IJ Global,‡ Infralatam, Economist Enterprise
    PPP INVESTMENT BY SECTOR (US$), 2016-25
    Transport
    Transport$49.0bn
    Renewables
    Renewables$15.7bn
    Energy (non-renewables)
    Energy (non-renewables)$15.3bn
    Water and waste
    Water and waste$17.3bn
    Social infrastructure
    Social infrastructure$1.2bn
    Digital infrastructure
    Digital infrastructure$0.1bn
    Source: IJ Global‡
    * Number of projects that reached financial close, including subnational projects. † Value of infrastructure PPPs (see definition in IJ Global footnote) divided by total infrastructure spending (estimated using Infralatam’s public sector estimates and Economist Impact calculations), averaged over the past ten years. ‡ Source: IJ Global, cross-checked with the World Bank PPI database. Data may include projects that are developed under PPP, sectoral or concession laws, with differences among countries. Focuses on greenfield and brownfield projects; excludes asset acquisition, company acquisition, securitization and refinancing transactions.
    Policies and institutions
    Brazil has a long-standing PPP market, supported by the PPP Law (2004), Concessions Law (1995) and New Procurement Law (2021). The Investment Partnership Program (PPI) operates through a multi-ministerial council (CPPI), which oversees the federal PPP and concessions program and prioritizes projects, and the Special Secretariat of the Investment Partnerships Program (SPPI), which supports project structuring and implementation.1 Sector ministries and regulatory agencies provide technical expertise, while the SPPI supports subnational partnership programs alongside federal financial institutions such as The Brazilian Development Bank and CAIXA.2,3 In 2026, Brazil signed an agreement to adopt SOURCE, a shared digital platform for preparing and managing infrastructure concessions and PPPs, with a view to extending its use across sectoral ministries.4
    Recent market developments
    Brazil has maintained a high level of PPP and concession activity under the current administration (2023-26), with the New Growth Acceleration Program incorporating private partnerships into its broader infrastructure investment agenda, alongside measures to improve project structuring and financing.5 Recent financial closes demonstrate continued activity across transport, sanitation and social infrastructure, including major highway concessions, water and sewage projects and state-level school PPPs. Meanwhile, the Federal Court of Accounts’ Secex Consenso mechanism, operational since 2023, has facilitated negotiated settlements and restructuring of major infrastructure concessions.6 The country’s financing framework also evolved in 2024, with Law 14,801 introducing infrastructure debentures and revising the existing tax-incentivized debenture regime, broadening options for mobilizing private capital.7
    Political and public support
    Brazil continues to benefit from broad political support for PPPs across successive administrations. The current administration (2023-26) has maintained an explicit PPP agenda, incorporating PPPs into the 2024-27 multi-year plan and introducing additional federal mechanisms to support subnational PPP structuring.8,9 Its 2026 Message to Congress identified the expansion of infrastructure partnerships as a priority,10 while major political figures and coalitions have also endorsed infrastructure partnerships, including in their 2022 presidential platforms.11,12,13 In May 2025, the Chamber of Deputies approved proposed reforms to modernize concessions and PPP legislation, although the bill remains pending in the Senate.14
    Notable strengths
    Brazil leads the region in regulations and institutions, supported by a comprehensive framework, capable PPP institutions and competitive procurement. Project preparation is another relative strength, underpinned by strong project-selection processes, dedicated preparation facilities and increasingly standardized project development. Brazil also benefits from the region’s most diverse PPP financing ecosystem, including institutional and sustainable finance. Brazil also has strong operational performance monitoring, and although ex-post evaluations are not required, the Federal Court of Accounts has demonstrated expertise in independently auditing operational concession outcomes.
    Notable challenges
    Brazil’s remaining weaknesses are relatively concentrated. Despite strong overall risk allocation, its PPP framework does not systematically codify disaster-risk management and force majeure provisions across sectors, leaving important details to individual contracts. In project preparation, gaps remain in technical appraisal and social-equity considerations: more detailed methodologies and tools are needed for fiscal-affordability and value-for-money assessments, while criteria relating to employment, gender, and small businesses are not systematically considered. Finally, despite strong performance monitoring, PPP outcomes are not systematically measured against national climate commitments or the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
    Recent progress
    Since the previous edition, Brazil has strengthened project preparation and infrastructure resilience. The 2026 agreement to adopt SOURCE represents a step toward more standardized project preparation and coordination across federal agencies, although broader implementation remains underway. Climate adaptation requirements have also advanced, including measures to incorporate resilience into infrastructure planning and federal road concessions. These developments support stronger performance in project preparation and sustainability, while Brazil’s mature regulatory, financing and monitoring frameworks have remained broadly stable.

    Top five recommendations for progress

    (ordered according to index category)

    1
    Strengthen PPP appraisal methodologies and tools
    Brazil should build on its existing appraisal requirements by developing more detailed fiscal-affordability and value-for-money methodologies, alongside standardized calculation tools for these assessments and cost-benefit analysis. Affordability assessments should also explicitly capture direct and contingent fiscal costs.
    Timeline to achieve
    Medium term
    Difficulty to achieve
    High
    Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
    Brazil: current score
    76.6
    Score with recommendation applied
    82.3
    020406080100
    2
    Publish the findings of PPP community consultations
    Brazil should complement its established consultation requirements by requiring authorities to proactively publish consultation findings online, improving transparency around stakeholder concerns and demonstrating how public input has informed PPP preparation and decision-making.
    Timeline to achieve
    Short term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Low
    Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
    Brazil: current score
    76.6
    Score with recommendation applied
    78.2
    020406080100
    3
    Integrate social-equity objectives more systematically into PPP development
    Brazil should translate broader social-policy objectives into concrete PPP development criteria, systematically considering gender inclusion, employment generation and opportunities for small businesses during project identification, assessment and preparation.
    Timeline to achieve
    Short term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Low
    Impact on category 2: Project preparation and sustainability
    Brazil: current score
    76.6
    Score with recommendation applied
    86.0
    020406080100
    4
    Standardize disaster-risk management and force majeure provisions across PPPs
    Brazil should build on existing sectoral and contractual practices by establishing consistent PPP-wide requirements for disaster-risk management, insurance and <i>force majeure</i>, including qualifying events, notification procedures, compensation and other contractual consequences.
    Timeline to achieve
    Medium term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Medium
    Impact on category 4: Risk management and contract monitoring
    Brazil: current score
    74.0
    Score with recommendation applied
    90.6
    020406080100
    5
    Measure PPP outcomes against national climate goals and the SDGs
    Brazil should integrate climate and sustainability objectives into its evaluation of operational PPPs, requiring project performance to be assessed against relevant national climate commitments and SDGs, including whether targeted outcomes were achieved.
    Timeline to achieve
    Medium term
    Difficulty to achieve
    Medium
    Impact on category 5: Performance evaluation and impact (ex-post)
    Brazil: current score
    67.0
    Score with recommendation applied
    92.0
    020406080100
    Assessment guidance:
    Short term: achievable in months (ie, straightforward activities such as procedural updates)
    Medium term: up to a year (ie, moderately involved activities such as building web platforms)
    Long term: more than a year (ie, time-consuming activities such as new legislation/institutions)
    Difficulty/complexity: rated as low/medium/high—often mirrors the time frame, but can differ based on how technical it is, how many resources are needed and how politically challenging it is, etc.
    1. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2023/decreto/d11412.htm
    2. https://www.gov.br/casacivil/pt-br/ocultadas/orgaos/seppi/apoio-federal-as-concessoes-e-parcerias-publico-privadas-dos-estados-do-distrito-federal-e-dos-municipios
    3. https://www.gov.br/mdr/pt-br/assuntos/fomento-e-parcerias-com-o-setor-privado/proponha-um-projeto/setor-publico
    4. https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/extrato-da-carta-de-aceitacao-696183684
    5. https://www.gov.br/casacivil/pt-br/novopac-antiga/novopac-backup-8-07-2024/medidas-institucionais/medidas-institucionais
    6. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/publicacoes-institucionais/ficha-sintese/fichas-sintese-solucao-consensual
    7. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/lei/l14801.htm
    8. https://www.gov.br/planejamento/pt-br/assuntos/planejamento/plano-plurianual/paginas/paginas-ppa-2024-2027/lei-do-ppa
    9. https://www.gov.br/tesouronacional/pt-br/noticias/medidas-de-apoio-a-gestao-fiscal-e-a-estruturacao-de-ppps-e-concessoes
    10. https://static.poder360.com.br/2026/02/mensagem-ao-congresso-nacional-2026.pdf
    11. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/leia-na-integra-a-versao-final-das-diretrizes-do-programa-de-governo-de-lula/
    12. https://ciam.net.br/pessoas/jair-bolsonaro-398
    13. https://simonetebet.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/diretrizes_simone_tebet.pdf
    14. https://www.camara.leg.br/noticias/1156391-camara-aprova-projeto-que-reformula-a-lei-de-concessoes-publicas

    Infrascope 2025/26

    Score 0–100 where 100 = best, rank out of 26 countries

    Nascent

    0 to <30

    Emerging

    30 to <60

    Developed

    60 to <80

    Mature

    80 to 100
    0102030405060708090100
    Infrascope 2025/26
    See the resource library for more downloads